CPU Comparison: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9454P
Key Findings
- The AMD EPYC 9655P leads in single-threaded performance by up to 28.5%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior performance with a 65.6% advantage
- The AMD EPYC 9655P has the highest core count with 96 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
AMD EPYC 9655P
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
1st fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs154th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1st fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
AMD EPYC 9454P
Release Date
Q3 2023
Market Position
16th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs520th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs12th fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
9655P
3,846
9454P
2,993
Multi-Thread Performance
9655P
158,845
9454P
95,918
Specifications: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9454P
💻CPU Model
AMD EPYC 9655P
9655P
AMD EPYC 9454P
9454P
🔄Other Names
AMD EPYC 9655P 96-Core Processor
9655P
AMD EPYC 9454P 48-Core Processor
9454P
⚡Base Clock
2.6 GHz
9655P
2.8 GHz
9454P
🚀Turbo Clock
4.5 GHz
9655P
3.8 GHz
9454P
💻Cores/Threads
96 Threads: 192
9655P
48 Threads: 96
9454P
🔌Socket
SP5
9655P
SP5
9454P
⚡TDP
400 W
9655P
290 W
9454P
💾Cache
N/A
9655P
L3 Cache: 256 MB
9454P
The AMD EPYC 9655P and AMD EPYC 9454P compete in the Server segment. The AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD EPYC 9454P takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD EPYC 9655P drawing more power under load (400W vs 290W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.
Similar Comparisons
Similar to AMD EPYC 9655P
Similar to AMD EPYC 9454P
Lower Performance
Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 @2.00GHz
Single-Thread Rating:3153
Multi-Thread Rating:89850
View Details
Better Performance
AMD EPYC 9554P
Single-Thread Rating:2942
Multi-Thread Rating:110733
View Details
Better Performance
AMD EPYC 9634
Single-Thread Rating:2924
Multi-Thread Rating:107944
View Details