CPU Comparison: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9474F
Key Findings
- The AMD EPYC 9655P leads in single-threaded performance by up to 20.5%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior performance with a 51.3% advantage
- The AMD EPYC 9655P has the highest core count with 96 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
AMD EPYC 9655P
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
1st fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs154th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1st fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
AMD EPYC 9474F
Release Date
Q2 2023
Market Position
12th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs437th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs9th fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
9655P
3,846
9474F
3,192
Multi-Thread Performance
9655P
158,845
9474F
105,010
Specifications: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9474F
💻CPU Model
AMD EPYC 9655P
9655P
AMD EPYC 9474F
9474F
🔄Other Names
AMD EPYC 9655P 96-Core Processor
9655P
AMD EPYC 9474F 48-Core Processor
9474F
âš¡Base Clock
2.6 GHz
9655P
3.6 GHz
9474F
🚀Turbo Clock
4.5 GHz
9655P
4.1 GHz
9474F
💻Cores/Threads
96 Threads: 192
9655P
48 Threads: 96
9474F
🔌Socket
SP5
9655P
SP5
9474F
âš¡TDP
400 W
9655P
360 W
9474F
💾Cache
N/A
9655P
N/A
9474F
The AMD EPYC 9655P and AMD EPYC 9474F compete in the Server segment. The AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD EPYC 9474F takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD EPYC 9655P drawing more power under load (400W vs 360W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.