CPU Comparison: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9634
Key Findings
- The AMD EPYC 9655P leads in single-threaded performance by up to 31.5%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior performance with a 47.2% advantage
- The AMD EPYC 9655P has the highest core count with 96 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
AMD EPYC 9655P
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
1st fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs154th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1st fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
AMD EPYC 9634
Release Date
Q1 2024
Market Position
11th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs551st fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs8th fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
9655P
3,846
9634
2,924
Multi-Thread Performance
9655P
158,845
9634
107,944
Specifications: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9634
💻CPU Model
AMD EPYC 9655P
9655P
AMD EPYC 9634
9634
🔄Other Names
AMD EPYC 9655P 96-Core Processor
9655P
AMD EPYC 9634 84-Core Processor
9634
⚡Base Clock
2.6 GHz
9655P
3.1 GHz
9634
🚀Turbo Clock
4.5 GHz
9655P
3.7 GHz
9634
💻Cores/Threads
96 Threads: 192
9655P
84 Threads: 168
9634
🔌Socket
SP5
9655P
SP5
9634
⚡TDP
400 W
9655P
290 W
9634
💾Cache
N/A
9655P
L1 Instruction Cache: 84 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 84 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 84 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 384 MB
9634
The AMD EPYC 9655P and AMD EPYC 9634 compete in the Server segment. The AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD EPYC 9634 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD EPYC 9655P drawing more power under load (400W vs 290W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.