CPU Comparison: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9654P
Key Findings
- The AMD EPYC 9655P leads in single-threaded performance by up to 47.0%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior performance with a 39.4% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
AMD EPYC 9655P
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
1st fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs154th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1st fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
AMD EPYC 9654P
Release Date
Q3 2023
Market Position
8th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs752nd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs5th fastest in
1041 Server CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
9655P
3,846
9654P
2,616
Multi-Thread Performance
9655P
158,845
9654P
113,949
Specifications: AMD EPYC 9655P vs AMD EPYC 9654P
💻CPU Model
AMD EPYC 9655P
9655P
AMD EPYC 9654P
9654P
🔄Other Names
AMD EPYC 9655P 96-Core Processor
9655P
AMD EPYC 9654P 96-Core Processor
9654P
âš¡Base Clock
2.6 GHz
9655P
2.4 GHz
9654P
🚀Turbo Clock
4.5 GHz
9655P
3.7 GHz
9654P
💻Cores/Threads
96 Threads: 192
9655P
96 Threads: 192
9654P
🔌Socket
SP5
9655P
SP5
9654P
âš¡TDP
400 W
9655P
360 W
9654P
💾Cache
N/A
9655P
L1 Instruction Cache: 96 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 96 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 96 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 384 MB
9654P
The AMD EPYC 9655P and AMD EPYC 9654P compete in the Server segment. The AMD EPYC 9655P shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD EPYC 9654P takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD EPYC 9655P drawing more power under load (400W vs 360W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.