CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 7840S vs Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz

Key Findings

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840S leads in single-threaded performance by up to 25.5%
In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840S shows superior performance with a 107.8% advantage
The AMD Ryzen 7 7840S has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

AMD Ryzen 7 7840S

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2023

Market Position

494th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs219th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs72nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2021

Market Position

1090th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs545th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs252nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

7840S

3,685

3.30GHz

2,936

Multi-Thread Performance

7840S

24,309

3.30GHz

11,697

Specifications: AMD Ryzen 7 7840S vs Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz

💻CPU Model

AMD Ryzen 7 7840S

7840S

Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz

3.30GHz

🔄Other Names

AMD Ryzen 7 7840S with Radeon 780M Graphics

7840S

11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz, 11th Gen Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz

3.30GHz

⚡Base Clock

3.8 GHz

7840S

3.3 GHz

3.30GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

5.1 GHz

7840S

4.8 GHz

3.30GHz

💻Cores/Threads

8 Threads: 16

7840S

4 Threads: 8

3.30GHz

🔌Socket

FP7 FP7r2 FP8

7840S

FCBGA1449

3.30GHz

⚡TDP

54 W

7840S

35 W

3.30GHz

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB

7840S

L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 4 x 1280 KBL3 Cache: 12 MB

3.30GHz

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840S and Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840S shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i7-11370H @ 3.30GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840S drawing more power under load (54W vs 35W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.