CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

Key Findings

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 13.2%
In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U shows superior performance with a 49.8% advantage
The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2023

Market Position

467th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs246th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs63rd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2022

Market Position

821st fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs441st fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs182nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

7840U

3,602

6650U

3,181

Multi-Thread Performance

7840U

24,990

6650U

16,679

Specifications: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

💻CPU Model

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

7840U

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U

6650U

🔄Other Names

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon(TM) 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U with Radeon 780M Graphics

7840U

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U with Radeon Graphics

6650U

⚡Base Clock

3.3 GHz

7840U

2.9 GHz

6650U

🚀Turbo Clock

5.1 GHz

7840U

4.5 GHz

6650U

💻Cores/Threads

8 Threads: 16

7840U

6 Threads: 12

6650U

🔌Socket

N/A

7840U

FP7

6650U

⚡TDP

30 W

7840U

28 W

6650U

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB

7840U

L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB

6650U

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U drawing more power under load (30W vs 28W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.