CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs Intel Core i9-13900H

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core i9-13900H leads in single-threaded performance by up to 14.4%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-13900H shows superior performance with a 76.5% advantage
  • The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2023
Market Position
467th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs246th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs63rd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core i9-13900H

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2023
Market Position
181st fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs69th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs7th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

7840U
3,602
i9-13900H
4,122

Multi-Thread Performance

7840U
24,990
i9-13900H
44,108

Specifications: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs Intel Core i9-13900H

💻CPU Model
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7840U
Intel Core i9-13900H
i9-13900H
🔄Other Names
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon(TM) 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U with Radeon 780M Graphics
7840U
13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900HX, 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900HX
i9-13900H
⚡Base Clock
3.3 GHz
7840U
N/A
i9-13900H
🚀Turbo Clock
5.1 GHz
7840U
N/A
i9-13900H
💻Cores/Threads
8 Threads: 16
7840U
N/A
i9-13900H
🔌Socket
N/A
7840U
FCBGA1964
i9-13900H
⚡TDP
30 W
7840U
55 W
i9-13900H
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB
7840U
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
i9-13900H

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and Intel Core i9-13900H compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core i9-13900H leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i9-13900H takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core i9-13900H drawing more power under load (55W vs 30W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.