CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD 3015e

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 135.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 457.0% advantage
The AMD 3015e has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD 3015e

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2020

Market Position

2600th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2537th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs596th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

3015e

1,339

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

3015e

2,712

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD 3015e

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD 3015e

3015e

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD 3015e with Radeon Graphics

3015e

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.2 GHz

3015e

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

2.3 GHz

3015e

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 4

3015e

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

3015e

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

6 W

3015e

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 4 MB

3015e

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD 3015e compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD 3015e takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 6W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.