CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD A9-9410

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 136.9%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 892.5% advantage
  • The AMD A9-9410 has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD A9-9410

Laptop
Release Date
Q3 2016
Market Position
3336th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs2561st fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs796th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
A9-9410
1,330

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
A9-9410
1,522

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD A9-9410

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD A9-9410 RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
A9-9410
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
2.9 GHz
A9-9410
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
3.5 GHz
A9-9410
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 (in 2 physical modules)
A9-9410
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FP4
A9-9410
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
25 W
A9-9410
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 96 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB
A9-9410

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD A9-9410 compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD A9-9410 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD A9-9410 drawing more power under load (25W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.