CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 362.7%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2271.4% advantage
The AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2009

Market Position

4212th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3822nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs1130th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

QL-65

681

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

QL-65

637

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65

QL-65

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon Dual-Core QL-65, AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core QL-65

QL-65

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.1 GHz

QL-65

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

QL-65

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

QL-65

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

QL-65

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

QL-65

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 512 KB

QL-65

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-65 drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.