CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 319.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2256.6% advantage
The AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2009

Market Position

4206th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3703rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs1127th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

QL-66

751

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

QL-66

641

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66

QL-66

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon(tm)X2 DualCore QL-66

QL-66

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.2 GHz

QL-66

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

QL-66

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

QL-66

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

QL-66

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

QL-66

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 512 KB

QL-66

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-66 drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.