CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 470.8%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2766.4% advantage
  • The AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2011
Market Position
4342nd fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs4092nd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1189th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
Dual-Core
552

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
Dual-Core
527

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core
Dual-Core
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo K345 Dual-Core Processor
Dual-Core
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.4 GHz
Dual-Core
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
Dual-Core
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
Dual-Core
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
Dual-Core
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
12 W
Dual-Core
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB
Dual-Core

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core drawing more power under load (12W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.