CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon XP2400+

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 787.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 6613.8% advantage
The AMD Athlon XP2400+ has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Athlon XP2400+

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2009

Market Position

4717th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4557th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1344th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

XP2400+

355

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

XP2400+

225

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon XP2400+

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon XP2400+

XP2400+

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+, mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP-M 2400+, mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2400+

XP2400+

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.0 GHz

XP2400+

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

XP2400+

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

XP2400+

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

XP2400+

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

N/A

XP2400+

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 512 KB

XP2400+

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Athlon XP2400+ compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Athlon XP2400+ leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Athlon XP2400+ takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Athlon XP2400+ drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.