CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD E2-9000e

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 321.3%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 1605.0% advantage
  • The AMD E2-9000e has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD E2-9000e

Laptop
Release Date
Q3 2017
Market Position
3911th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs3706th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs999th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
E2-9000e
748

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
E2-9000e
886

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD E2-9000e

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD E2-9000e
E2-9000e
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD E2-9000e RADEON R2, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
E2-9000e
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.5 GHz
E2-9000e
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
2.0 GHz
E2-9000e
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 (in 2 physical modules)
E2-9000e
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
E2-9000e
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
6 W
E2-9000e
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 96 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB
E2-9000e

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD E2-9000e compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD E2-9000e leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD E2-9000e takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 6W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.