CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD E2-9010

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 246.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 1282.1% advantage
The AMD E2-9010 has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD E2-9010

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2017

Market Position

3692nd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3416th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs923rd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

E2-9010

909

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

E2-9010

1,093

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD E2-9010

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD E2-9010

E2-9010

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD E2-9010 RADEON R2, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G

E2-9010

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.0 GHz

E2-9010

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

2.2 GHz

E2-9010

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 (in 2 physical modules)

E2-9010

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FP4

E2-9010

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

15 W

E2-9010

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 96 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB

E2-9010

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD E2-9010 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD E2-9010 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD E2-9010 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD E2-9010 drawing more power under load (15W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.