CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD FX-8800P

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 128.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 429.8% advantage
The AMD FX-8800P has the highest core count with 4 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD FX-8800P

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2015

Market Position

2549th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2476th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs583rd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

FX-8800P

1,380

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

FX-8800P

2,851

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD FX-8800P

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD FX-8800P

FX-8800P

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD FX-8800P Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G

FX-8800P

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.1 GHz

FX-8800P

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

3.4 GHz

FX-8800P

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

4 (in 2 physical modules)

FX-8800P

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FP4

FX-8800P

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

FX-8800P

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 96 KBL2 Cache: 4 x 1024 KB

FX-8800P

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD FX-8800P compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD FX-8800P takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD FX-8800P drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.