CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD FX-9800P

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 156.6%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 494.0% advantage
  • The AMD FX-9800P has the highest core count with 4 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD FX-9800P

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2016
Market Position
2691st fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs2747th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs625th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
FX-9800P
1,228

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
FX-9800P
2,543

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD FX-9800P

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
FX-9800P
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
2.7 GHz
FX-9800P
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
3.6 GHz
FX-9800P
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
4 (in 4 physical modules)
FX-9800P
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
FX-9800P
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
15 W
FX-9800P
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 96 KBL2 Cache: 4 x 1024 KB
FX-9800P

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD FX-9800P compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD FX-9800P takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD FX-9800P drawing more power under load (15W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.