CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD GX-210JA SOC

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1264.1%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 5991.1% advantage
The AMD GX-210JA SOC has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD GX-210JA SOC

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2015

Market Position

4677th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4789th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1320th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

SOC

231

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

SOC

248

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD GX-210JA SOC

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD GX-210JA SOC

SOC

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD GX-210JA SOC with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

SOC

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.0 GHz

SOC

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

SOC

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

SOC

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FT3 (769-BGA)

SOC

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

6 W

SOC

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB

SOC

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD GX-210JA SOC compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD GX-210JA SOC takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 6W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.