CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD R-260H APU

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 249.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 1483.4% advantage
The AMD R-260H APU has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD R-260H APU

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2017

Market Position

3841st fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3432nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs979th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

APU

902

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

APU

954

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD R-260H APU

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD R-260H APU

APU

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD R-260H APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

APU

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.1 GHz

APU

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

2.6 GHz

APU

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 (in 2 physical modules)

APU

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

BGA827 (FP2)

APU

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

17 W

APU

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 16 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 2048 KB

APU

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD R-260H APU compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD R-260H APU leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD R-260H APU takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD R-260H APU drawing more power under load (17W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.