CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Key Findings

  • The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS leads in single-threaded performance by up to 12.3%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS shows superior performance with a 76.9% advantage
  • The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2023
Market Position
417th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs263rd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs54th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
7840HS
3,538

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
7840HS
26,716

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
7840HS
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics
7840HS
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
3.8 GHz
7840HS
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
5.1 GHz
7840HS
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
8 Threads: 16
7840HS
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FP7 FP7r2 FP8
7840HS
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
54 W
7840HS
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB
7840HS

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS drawing more power under load (54W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.