CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 21.5%
In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS shows superior performance with a 25.5% advantage
The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2020

Market Position

711th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs770th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs144th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

4900HS

2,594

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

4900HS

18,954

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

4900HS

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS with Radeon Graphics, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HSS with Radeon Graphics

4900HS

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

3.0 GHz

4900HS

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

4.3 GHz

4900HS

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

8 Threads: 16

4900HS

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FP6

4900HS

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

4900HS

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 8 MB

4900HS

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.