CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Key Findings
- The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS leads in single-threaded performance by up to 23.9%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS shows superior performance with a 101.2% advantage
- The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has the highest core count with 8 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Release Date
Q2 2023
Market Position
329th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs130th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs32nd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
164U
3,151
7940HS
3,905
Multi-Thread Performance
164U
15,106
7940HS
30,395
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7940HS
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS with Radeon 780M Graphics
7940HS
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
164U
4.0 GHz
7940HS
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
5.2 GHz
7940HS
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
8 Threads: 16
7940HS
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FP7 FP7r2 FP8
7940HS
âš¡TDP
9 W
164U
54 W
7940HS
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB
7940HS
The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS drawing more power under load (54W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.