CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 409.9%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2885.4% advantage
  • The AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80 has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2009
Market Position
4365th fastest in multithreading
4891 CPUs3939th fastest in single threading
4891 CPUs1198th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
ZM-80
618

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
ZM-80
506

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80
ZM-80
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Turion Dual-Core ZM-80, AMD Turion(tm) X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80, AMD Turion(tm)X2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-80
ZM-80
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
2.1 GHz
ZM-80
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
ZM-80
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
ZM-80
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
S1
ZM-80
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
32 W
ZM-80
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB
ZM-80

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Turion X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-80 drawing more power under load (32W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.