CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 321.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2098.8% advantage
The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2009

Market Position

4149th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3710th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs1101st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

1.80GHz

748

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

1.80GHz

687

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz

1.80GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Celeron(R) Dual-Core CPU T3000 @ 1.80GHz

1.80GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.8 GHz

1.80GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

1.80GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

1.80GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

PGA478

1.80GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

1.80GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

1.80GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 @ 1.80GHz drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.