CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 366.8%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 673.5% advantage
The Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz has the highest core count with 4 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2017

Market Position

3033rd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3832nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs709th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

1.60GHz

675

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

1.60GHz

1,953

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz

1.60GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Atom(TM) Processor E3900 @ 1.60GHz

1.60GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.6 GHz

1.60GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

1.60GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

4 Threads: 4

1.60GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

1.60GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

N/A

1.60GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 16 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 16 x 24 KBL2 Cache: 4 x 1024 KB

1.60GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Atom E3900 @ 1.60GHz drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.