CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 308.2%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 1700.5% advantage
  • The Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2013
Market Position
3969th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs3671st fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1023rd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
1.50GHz
772

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
1.50GHz
839

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz
1.50GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1007U @ 1.50GHz, Intel Celeron CPU 1007U @ 1.50GHz
1.50GHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.5 GHz
1.50GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
1.50GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
1.50GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FCBGA1023
1.50GHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
17 W
1.50GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 256 KBL3 Cache: 2 MB
1.50GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron 1007U @ 1.50GHz drawing more power under load (17W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.