CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 398.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 4356.0% advantage
The Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2009

Market Position

4545th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs3906th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1267th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.13GHz

632

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.13GHz

339

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz

2.13GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 560 @ 2.13GHz

2.13GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.1 GHz

2.13GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.13GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

2.13GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

PGA478

2.13GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

31 W

2.13GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

2.13GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron 560 @ 2.13GHz drawing more power under load (31W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.