CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 246.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 3066.9% advantage
The Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2010

Market Position

4392nd fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs3415th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1215th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.30GHz

910

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.30GHz

477

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz

2.30GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 925 @ 2.30GHz

2.30GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.3 GHz

2.30GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.30GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

2.30GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

2.30GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

2.30GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

2.30GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.