CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 933.1%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 6735.3% advantage
The Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2008

Market Position

4723rd fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4664th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1349th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

1.40GHz

305

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

1.40GHz

221

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz

1.40GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.40GHz, Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1400MHz

1.40GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.4 GHz

1.40GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

1.40GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

1.40GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

H-PBGA479, PPGA4

1.40GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

21 W

1.40GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

N/A

1.40GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron M 360 1.40GHz drawing more power under load (21W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.