CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 422.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2891.3% advantage
The Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2014

Market Position

4366th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs3977th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1199th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.13GHz

603

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.13GHz

505

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz

2.13GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2820 @ 2.13GHz

2.13GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.1 GHz

2.13GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

2.4 GHz

2.13GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

2.13GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FCBGA1170

2.13GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

7.5 W

2.13GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 24 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

2.13GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron N2820 @ 2.13GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 7W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.