CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 403.4%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2656.6% advantage
  • The Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2014
Market Position
4320th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs3918th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1180th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
2.16GHz
626

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
2.16GHz
548

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz
2.16GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2830 @ 2.16GHz, Intel Celeron CPU N2830 @ 2.16GHz
2.16GHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
2.2 GHz
2.16GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
2.4 GHz
2.16GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
2.16GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FCBGA1170
2.16GHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
7.5 W
2.16GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 24 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB
2.16GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron N2830 @ 2.16GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 7W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.