CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 470.8%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 1490.1% advantage
  • The Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz has the highest core count with 4 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2014
Market Position
3848th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs4093rd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs982nd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
1.86GHz
552

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
1.86GHz
950

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz
1.86GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2920 @ 1.86GHz, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2920 @ 1.86GHz, Intel Celeron CPU N2920 @ 1.86GHz
1.86GHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.9 GHz
1.86GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
2.0 GHz
1.86GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
4 Threads: 4
1.86GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FCBGA1170
1.86GHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
7.5 W
1.86GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 24 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB
1.86GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron N2920 @ 1.86GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 7W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.