CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 470.8%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2473.4% advantage
  • The Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q3 2015
Market Position
4266th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs4090th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1159th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
1.60GHz
552

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
1.60GHz
587

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz
1.60GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz, Intel Celeron CPU N3050 @ 1.60GHz
1.60GHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.6 GHz
1.60GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
2.2 GHz
1.60GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
1.60GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FCBGA1170
1.60GHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
6 W
1.60GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 24 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 1024 KB
1.60GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron N3050 @ 1.60GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 6W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.