CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz
Key Findings
- The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 401.0%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2641.6% advantage
- The Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz
Release Date
Q1 2009
Market Position
4315th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs3916th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs1177th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
164U
3,151
1.66GHz
629
Multi-Thread Performance
164U
15,106
1.66GHz
551
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz
1.66GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Genuine Intel(R) CPU T1600 @ 1.66GHz, Genuine Intel CPU T1600 @ 1.66GHz
1.66GHz
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.7 GHz
1.66GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
1.66GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
1.66GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
1.66GHz
âš¡TDP
9 W
164U
35 W
1.66GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB
1.66GHz
The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.
For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron T1600 @ 1.66GHz drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.