CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core i3-N300

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 49.7%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 75.3% advantage
  • The Intel Core i3-N300 has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core i3-N300

Laptop
Release Date
Q3 2023
Market Position
1311th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs1330th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs302nd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
i3-N300
2,105

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
i3-N300
8,617

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core i3-N300

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel Core i3-N300
i3-N300
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-N300, Intel Core i3-N300
i3-N300
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
i3-N300
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
3.8 GHz
i3-N300
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
8 Threads: 8
i3-N300
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FCBGA1264
i3-N300
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
7 W
i3-N300
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 6 MB
i3-N300

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Core i3-N300 compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i3-N300 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 7W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.