CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V leads in single-threaded performance by up to 46.0%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V shows superior performance with a 29.4% advantage

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2024

Market Position

685th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs21st fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs137th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

288V

4,600

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

288V

19,542

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

288V

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 288V

288V

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

288V

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

288V

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

N/A

288V

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FCBGA2833

288V

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

30 W

288V

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 4 x 2560 KBL3 Cache: 12 MB

288V

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V drawing more power under load (30W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.