CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 208.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 1473.5% advantage
The Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2009

Market Position

3834th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3190th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs977th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.53GHz

1,022

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.53GHz

960

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz

2.53GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz, Intel Core2 Duo CPU P8700 @ 2.53GHz

2.53GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.5 GHz

2.53GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.53GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

2.53GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

BGA479

2.53GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

25 W

2.53GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 3072 KB

2.53GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz drawing more power under load (25W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.