CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 257.7%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 859.1% advantage
The Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz has the highest core count with 4 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2009

Market Position

3292nd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3473rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs788th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.00GHz

881

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.00GHz

1,575

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz

2.00GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9000 @ 2.00GHz

2.00GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.0 GHz

2.00GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.00GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

4 Threads: 4

2.00GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

PGA478

2.00GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

45 W

2.00GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 3072 KB

2.00GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core2 Quad Q9000 @ 2.00GHz drawing more power under load (45W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.