CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 157.9%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 969.1% advantage
The Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2013

Market Position

3416th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2762nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs814th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.50GHz

1,222

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.50GHz

1,413

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz

2.50GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU 2030M @ 2.50GHz

2.50GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.5 GHz

2.50GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.50GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

2.50GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FCPGA988

2.50GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

2.50GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 256 KBL3 Cache: 2 MB

2.50GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Pentium 2030M @ 2.50GHz drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.