CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 520.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 6554.6% advantage
The Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2009

Market Position

4714th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4216th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1342nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.26GHz

508

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.26GHz

227

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz

2.26GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.26GHz

2.26GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.3 GHz

2.26GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.26GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

2.26GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

H-PBGA479, PPGA4

2.26GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

27 W

2.26GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

N/A

2.26GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Pentium M 2.26GHz drawing more power under load (27W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.