CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1050.0%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 8838.5% advantage
The Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2009

Market Position

4798th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4716th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1388th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

1600+

274

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

1600+

169

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+

1600+

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+, mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP-M 1600+

1600+

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.4 GHz

1600+

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

1600+

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

1600+

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

1600+

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

N/A

1600+

💾Cache

N/A

164U

N/A

1600+

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 1600+ drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.