CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 787.6%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 6584.1% advantage
  • The Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2009
Market Position
4715th fastest in multithreading
4891 CPUs4559th fastest in single threading
4891 CPUs1343rd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
2500+
355

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
2500+
226

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+
2500+
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP-M 2500+, mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2500+, Mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+
2500+
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.9 GHz
2500+
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
2500+
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
1 Threads: 1
2500+
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
2500+
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
N/A
2500+
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 512 KB
2500+

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ compete in the Laptop segment. The Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Mobile AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.