CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 800.3%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 5515.6% advantage
The Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+ has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2008

Market Position

4648th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4573rd fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1308th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

3000+

350

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

3000+

269

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+

3000+

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+, Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) 3000+

3000+

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.8 GHz

3000+

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

3000+

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

3000+

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

Socket 754

3000+

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

N/A

3000+

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 128 KB

3000+

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+ compete in the Laptop segment. The Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+ leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+ takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Mobile AMD Sempron 3000+ drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.