CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 500.2%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 6065.7% advantage
The Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+ has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+

Laptop

Release Date

Q4 2008

Market Position

4680th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4169th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1323rd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

3200+

525

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

3200+

245

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+

3200+

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3200+

3200+

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.8 GHz

3200+

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

3200+

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

3200+

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

3200+

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

N/A

3200+

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 512 KB

3200+

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+ compete in the Laptop segment. The Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+ leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+ takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Mobile AMD Sempron 3200+ drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.