CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100

Key Findings

All CPUs perform similarly in single-threaded tasks
In multi-threaded workloads, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100 shows superior performance with a 52.5% advantage
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100 has the highest core count with 12 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

535th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs443rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs86th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

X1E-78-100

3,174

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

X1E-78-100

23,038

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100

X1E-78-100

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E78100 - Qualcomm(R) Or, Snapdragon® X Elite - X1E78100 - Qualcomm® Oryon™, Snapdragon(TM) X Elite - X1E78100 - Qualcomm(TM)

X1E-78-100

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

3.4 GHz

X1E-78-100

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

3.4 GHz

X1E-78-100

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

12 Threads: 12

X1E-78-100

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

X1E-78-100

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

23 W

X1E-78-100

💾Cache

N/A

164U

N/A

X1E-78-100

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100 compete in the Laptop segment. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite - X1E-78-100 drawing more power under load (23W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.