CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable)

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1130.9%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 7978.1% advantage
  • The VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable) has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable)

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2011
Market Position
4772nd fastest in multithreading
4891 CPUs4748th fastest in single threading
4891 CPUs1374th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
Capable)
256

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
Capable)
187

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable)

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable)
Capable)
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano processor U2250 (1.6GHz Capable)
Capable)
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.3 GHz
Capable)
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
1.6 GHz
Capable)
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
1 Threads: 1
Capable)
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
BGA400
Capable)
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
8 W
Capable)
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB
Capable)

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable) compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the VIA Nano U2250 (1.6GHz Capable) takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 8W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.