CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1919.9%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 8339.1% advantage
  • The VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q1 2011
Market Position
4787th fastest in multithreading
4891 CPUs4872nd fastest in single threading
4891 CPUs1381st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
U2250@1300+MHz
156

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
U2250@1300+MHz
179

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz
U2250@1300+MHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano processor U2250@1300+MHz
U2250@1300+MHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.3 GHz
U2250@1300+MHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
1.6 GHz
U2250@1300+MHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
1 Threads: 1
U2250@1300+MHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
BGA400
U2250@1300+MHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
10 W
U2250@1300+MHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB
U2250@1300+MHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the VIA Nano U2250@1300+MHz drawing more power under load (10W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.