CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1612.5%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 7491.0% advantage
  • The VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q3 2011
Market Position
4748th fastest in multithreading
4891 CPUs4848th fastest in single threading
4891 CPUs1358th fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
U2500@1200MHz
184

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
U2500@1200MHz
199

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz
U2500@1200MHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano processor U2500@1200MHz
U2500@1200MHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.2 GHz
U2500@1200MHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
U2500@1200MHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
1 Threads: 1
U2500@1200MHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
BGA400
U2500@1200MHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
7 W
U2500@1200MHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB
U2500@1200MHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the VIA Nano U2500@1200MHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 7W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.