CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1001.7%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 8109.8% advantage
The VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2011

Market Position

4775th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4697th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1375th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

U3500@1000MHz

286

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

U3500@1000MHz

184

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz

U3500@1000MHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz

U3500@1000MHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.0 GHz

U3500@1000MHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

U3500@1000MHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

U3500@1000MHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

BGA400

U3500@1000MHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

5 W

U3500@1000MHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

N/A

U3500@1000MHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the VIA Nano U3500@1000MHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 5W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.