CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 957.4%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 3676.5% advantage
  • The VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz

Laptop
Release Date
Q3 2013
Market Position
4475th fastest in multithreading
4891 CPUs4675th fastest in single threading
4891 CPUs1243rd fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U
3,151
GHz
298

Multi-Thread Performance

164U
15,106
GHz
400

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz
GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz
GHz
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
1.2 GHz
GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
2 Threads: 2
GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
BGA400
GHz
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
N/A
GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB
GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.